Sunday, June 03, 2007
Next Meeting: Wed., June 13th, 6:30 p.m.
Regular meetings of the Plymouth Democratic Town Committee are now held at the China Pilgrim Restaurant, 204 South Meadow Road (near the airport) beginning at 6:30 p.m. The agenda usually includes a platter of appetizers (contributions welcome!) and a guest speaker. This week we're focusing on the 'web', with appearances by our alleged webmaster, Frank Mand, and long-time Democratic activitist and techie, Phil Edmundson.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Next Meeting, Wednesday, March 14th: 6:30 p.m.
The next meeting of the Plymouth Democratic Town Committee will take place Wednesday, March 14th, beginning at 6:30 p.m., in the Community Building of the Plymouth Airport, off South Meadow Road
-all our welcome!
The PDTC has recently embarked on a drive to recruit new members, especially active members, and have formed an adhoc committee to that end, chaired by Janet Alfieri. If you are interested in being a part of this effort, contact janet at 508 746-9437.
A good sign of the committee's vitality, was seen in the turnout for the committee's annual caucus. Attendance numbered in the seventies, and from that group 24 members were selected as delegates to the annual issues convention, which will take place this May 19th in Amherst.
For any questions about the committee or its work, contact Chairman Jon Graham at 508 888-9445.
-all our welcome!
The PDTC has recently embarked on a drive to recruit new members, especially active members, and have formed an adhoc committee to that end, chaired by Janet Alfieri. If you are interested in being a part of this effort, contact janet at 508 746-9437.
A good sign of the committee's vitality, was seen in the turnout for the committee's annual caucus. Attendance numbered in the seventies, and from that group 24 members were selected as delegates to the annual issues convention, which will take place this May 19th in Amherst.
For any questions about the committee or its work, contact Chairman Jon Graham at 508 888-9445.
Friday, April 28, 2006
Darfur Vigil, April 30
For years, many of us have read reports of the ongoing genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan, and wondered why world leaders have failed to step in. As many as 400,000 civilians have died1 and over 2 million have been driven from their homes,2 and yet the United States and other leading nations won't intervene and stop the killing.
This week, we may have the best chance since the genocide began to capture national media attention and give our leaders a mandate to act. On Sunday, April 30th, tens of thousands of concerned Americans, organized by the Save Darfur coalition, will gather in Washington to demand a real multi-national peacekeeping force to protect civilians in Darfur and end the genocide—now.
To support this urgent call, we're launching a "virtual march" to end the genocide in Darfur. We'll announce the total number of virtual marchers and read some of your comments at the big rally in DC (with the national media looking on) and then we'll deliver every signature to Congress and the President. We're aiming to sign up 100,000 virtual marchers in time for the rally—can you help us get there?
You can join the virtual march against genocide by clicking here:
http://political.moveon.org/darfur?id=7381-5663936-kax4yUXWT2jf340FzBzapA&t=2
This week, we may have the best chance since the genocide began to capture national media attention and give our leaders a mandate to act. On Sunday, April 30th, tens of thousands of concerned Americans, organized by the Save Darfur coalition, will gather in Washington to demand a real multi-national peacekeeping force to protect civilians in Darfur and end the genocide—now.
To support this urgent call, we're launching a "virtual march" to end the genocide in Darfur. We'll announce the total number of virtual marchers and read some of your comments at the big rally in DC (with the national media looking on) and then we'll deliver every signature to Congress and the President. We're aiming to sign up 100,000 virtual marchers in time for the rally—can you help us get there?
You can join the virtual march against genocide by clicking here:
http://political.moveon.org/darfur?id=7381-5663936-kax4yUXWT2jf340FzBzapA&t=2
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Town Committee to ReOrganize April 11
The Plymouth Democratic Town Committee will meet on Tuesday, April 11th, in the Otto Fehlow room of the Main Library on South Street -beginning at 7 p.m.. The main purpose of the meeting will to choose a new chairperson, and members of the Executive Committee. If you are interested in serving the committee as Chair, or Exec Board member, please contact Committee Chair Jon Graham at JonGrahamEsq@Aol.com
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Troops Support Withdrawal from Iraq
BY DREW BROWN
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - Nearly three out of four American troops serving in Iraq think U.S. forces should withdraw within a year, and more than one in four say the United States should leave immediately, according to a new poll published Tuesday.
The poll, conducted by Zogby International and the Center for Peace and Global Studies at Le Moyne College in Syracuse, N.Y., was a rare effort to determine the views of American troops serving in a ground war.
Twenty-nine percent of the troops surveyed said U.S. forces should leave Iraq immediately, another 22 percent said they should leave within the next six months and 21 percent said within six to 12 months. Twenty-three percent agreed with President Bush's call for troops to stay "as long as they are needed" and 5 percent were unsure.
David Segal, a military sociologist at the University of Maryland, said that while most service members were more conservative than society as a whole, it wasn't surprising to see them reflect attitudes similar to civilians, who increasingly oppose the war.
Those views aren't necessarily an indication that troops are losing faith in the war, Segal said.
"One could argue that troops are saying, `Hey, we've accomplished a great deal. It's time to get out,' which is what you hear a lot of people in Washington saying," he said.
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - Nearly three out of four American troops serving in Iraq think U.S. forces should withdraw within a year, and more than one in four say the United States should leave immediately, according to a new poll published Tuesday.
The poll, conducted by Zogby International and the Center for Peace and Global Studies at Le Moyne College in Syracuse, N.Y., was a rare effort to determine the views of American troops serving in a ground war.
Twenty-nine percent of the troops surveyed said U.S. forces should leave Iraq immediately, another 22 percent said they should leave within the next six months and 21 percent said within six to 12 months. Twenty-three percent agreed with President Bush's call for troops to stay "as long as they are needed" and 5 percent were unsure.
David Segal, a military sociologist at the University of Maryland, said that while most service members were more conservative than society as a whole, it wasn't surprising to see them reflect attitudes similar to civilians, who increasingly oppose the war.
Those views aren't necessarily an indication that troops are losing faith in the war, Segal said.
"One could argue that troops are saying, `Hey, we've accomplished a great deal. It's time to get out,' which is what you hear a lot of people in Washington saying," he said.
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Add-On Delegate Process Meeting
Please join members of the Minority Caucus for an information session about the add-on delegate process for the nominating convention to be held
June 2 and 3 2006
in
Worcester MA
WHEN: Saturday, March 4, 2006
WHERE: The Senior Center-Lowell, MA
276 Broadway Street
TIME: 1:00 PM
Who is eligible to be an add-on delegate? There are three categories available: 1. Minority delegates which are Hispanic, African American, Cape Verdian, Native American, and Asian as defined by the EEOC, per the DSC charter. 2. Handicapped individuals. 3. Youth, age 18-35. All applicants must have been registered Democrats by December 3, 2005.
We will have applications available at this meeting; all applications must be received by the DSC no later than 5:00 PM, March 18th. You do not have to be committed to a candidate to participate.
Please RSVP to this meeting by Thursday March 2nd so we can ensure proper room set up. You can RSVP to Faye Morrison via email fayem01852@yahoo.com or by phone 978-772-4629. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me by either method mentioned above.
Please send this information out to everyone you know, however this event is not an outreach opportunity for campaigns, and any such work will have to be done outside of the meeting room. Directions provided upon request.
June 2 and 3 2006
in
Worcester MA
WHEN: Saturday, March 4, 2006
WHERE: The Senior Center-Lowell, MA
276 Broadway Street
TIME: 1:00 PM
Who is eligible to be an add-on delegate? There are three categories available: 1. Minority delegates which are Hispanic, African American, Cape Verdian, Native American, and Asian as defined by the EEOC, per the DSC charter. 2. Handicapped individuals. 3. Youth, age 18-35. All applicants must have been registered Democrats by December 3, 2005.
We will have applications available at this meeting; all applications must be received by the DSC no later than 5:00 PM, March 18th. You do not have to be committed to a candidate to participate.
Please RSVP to this meeting by Thursday March 2nd so we can ensure proper room set up. You can RSVP to Faye Morrison via email fayem01852@yahoo.com or by phone 978-772-4629. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me by either method mentioned above.
Please send this information out to everyone you know, however this event is not an outreach opportunity for campaigns, and any such work will have to be done outside of the meeting room. Directions provided upon request.
Thursday, January 05, 2006
January Meeting/Convention Caucus
The first 2006 meeting of the Democratic Town Committee will take place Tuesday, January 24th at 7:30 p.m., in the upstairs conference center at the Main Library on South Street.
One subject to be discussed is the upcoming Democratic Convention in June, at which candidates for governor will seek to win the support of the delegates.
Registered Democrats interested in attending the convention as a delegate, must attend the local Caucus, which will take place approximately ten days after this month's PDTC meeting, (on Saturday, February 4) in the Conference Room of the Cedarville Fire Station beginning at 10 a.m.
One subject to be discussed is the upcoming Democratic Convention in June, at which candidates for governor will seek to win the support of the delegates.
Registered Democrats interested in attending the convention as a delegate, must attend the local Caucus, which will take place approximately ten days after this month's PDTC meeting, (on Saturday, February 4) in the Conference Room of the Cedarville Fire Station beginning at 10 a.m.
Tuesday, December 20, 2005
No Meeting in December
We are still trying to work out a stable, convenient location for our regular monthly meetings.. if you have a location in mind, don't hesitate to suggest it to chairman Jon Graham. Because of the holidays there will be no December meeting.
Note that Gubernatorial candidate Deval Patrick, will be in Plymouth on January 4th, to speak with local residents about his candidacy. If you'd like to meet with, and ask questions of Mr. Patrick, the meeting will take place at the Radisson, beginning at 6 p.m.
Note that Gubernatorial candidate Deval Patrick, will be in Plymouth on January 4th, to speak with local residents about his candidacy. If you'd like to meet with, and ask questions of Mr. Patrick, the meeting will take place at the Radisson, beginning at 6 p.m.
Thursday, December 01, 2005
Pillar Fight
Georgie is at it again: I suppose we should be happy that at least he's come out of his hole, even if its only so that he could tell us how hard he's been working.
And what has he been working on - why Victory in Iraq, don't you know: a detailed (as far as he will go at least), three-pronged strategy for defeating the terrorists, re-building the country, and spreading democracy. Kind of like a series of fertilizer treatments, to kill the crab grass, encourage the good grass to grow, and make the lawn nice and green so it fits in with the neighbor's lawns.
The 38 page report that they distributed today, concludes with several pages of what they call "The Strategic Pillars":
The first pillar is "Defeat the Terrorists and Neutralize the Insurgency", which even I think is an improvement on their previous strategy of attracting terrorists and ignoring the insurgency. Of course they just kind of ignore their past mistakes, and hope no one notices. "Heck," their spokesmen say, "this has been the plan all along. Honest!".
The second pillar is "Transition Iraq to Security Self-Reliance", which is a hoot: kind of like saying, 'transition the junkie to a drug-free mobile home park'. Easier said than done. And what happened to those hordes of well wishers that were going to greet our troops like Jesus on his way into Jerusalem? And you know how that turned out.
The third pillar is "Help Iraqis Form a National Compact for Democratic Government", which is awkwardly put, but I think means that we are going to lead the horse to water, and then make him drink, as soon that is, as we get the water running again, and the oil, and electricity. Once the lights stay on, Democracy is a cinch.
Pillar Five is "Help Iraq Strengthen its Economy", which is something I think we should have thought of before we bombed the crap out of every major city in Iraq. But hey, its kind of what the new owners of a sports franchise would do after paying the big bucks for the team: raise ticket prices, knock down the old stadium, and build a new one with taxpayers money, being sure to add plenty of sky boxes for rich sponsors. Right now they're negotiating with a major corporation for naming rights: not for a stadium, for the whole country. They were all set to go with Enronia, but that pillar of society had its own problems.
Pillar Six is "Help Iraq Strengthen the Rule of Law and Promote Civil Rights" and after they're sure that this pillar is up, they're going to try and do the same here in America. It's going to be difficult though, what with the way George has been dissing the Geneva Convention, arguing for the right to torture prisoners, laughing at the world court, hiding prisoners all around the world and letting the local Taliban screw with everybody.
And then on the same day that they offer up Pillar Seven -"Increase International Support for Iraq", it's revealed they've been paying millions to a contractor who pays Iraqi journalists to slip in propaganda pieces into Iraqi newspapers. Oh well, at least they're trying. And anyway, after Abu Ghraib and the discovery of the secret torture prisons run by our favorite Iraqis, I don't think they are really serious, or care, about their reputations.
And this was always, the report insists, part of their master plan all along. Even that 'Mission Accomplished" banner and George posing in San Diego harbor, were part of their brilliant plan for victory in Iraq.
"You see I was pretendin," George seems to be saying, winking and grinnin, and squinting at the teleprompter. "I was pretendin we had already won, to fool the terrorists in to thinkin they had already lost, to lull them into a false sense of security, so we could sneak up on em and hit them with this big plan here, and these pillars.."
"And lord knows in a pillar fight -at least the kind like me and Condi have down in Crawford after the misses is asleep, the guy with the biggest pillar wins every time.
And what has he been working on - why Victory in Iraq, don't you know: a detailed (as far as he will go at least), three-pronged strategy for defeating the terrorists, re-building the country, and spreading democracy. Kind of like a series of fertilizer treatments, to kill the crab grass, encourage the good grass to grow, and make the lawn nice and green so it fits in with the neighbor's lawns.
The 38 page report that they distributed today, concludes with several pages of what they call "The Strategic Pillars":
The first pillar is "Defeat the Terrorists and Neutralize the Insurgency", which even I think is an improvement on their previous strategy of attracting terrorists and ignoring the insurgency. Of course they just kind of ignore their past mistakes, and hope no one notices. "Heck," their spokesmen say, "this has been the plan all along. Honest!".
The second pillar is "Transition Iraq to Security Self-Reliance", which is a hoot: kind of like saying, 'transition the junkie to a drug-free mobile home park'. Easier said than done. And what happened to those hordes of well wishers that were going to greet our troops like Jesus on his way into Jerusalem? And you know how that turned out.
The third pillar is "Help Iraqis Form a National Compact for Democratic Government", which is awkwardly put, but I think means that we are going to lead the horse to water, and then make him drink, as soon that is, as we get the water running again, and the oil, and electricity. Once the lights stay on, Democracy is a cinch.
Pillar Five is "Help Iraq Strengthen its Economy", which is something I think we should have thought of before we bombed the crap out of every major city in Iraq. But hey, its kind of what the new owners of a sports franchise would do after paying the big bucks for the team: raise ticket prices, knock down the old stadium, and build a new one with taxpayers money, being sure to add plenty of sky boxes for rich sponsors. Right now they're negotiating with a major corporation for naming rights: not for a stadium, for the whole country. They were all set to go with Enronia, but that pillar of society had its own problems.
Pillar Six is "Help Iraq Strengthen the Rule of Law and Promote Civil Rights" and after they're sure that this pillar is up, they're going to try and do the same here in America. It's going to be difficult though, what with the way George has been dissing the Geneva Convention, arguing for the right to torture prisoners, laughing at the world court, hiding prisoners all around the world and letting the local Taliban screw with everybody.
And then on the same day that they offer up Pillar Seven -"Increase International Support for Iraq", it's revealed they've been paying millions to a contractor who pays Iraqi journalists to slip in propaganda pieces into Iraqi newspapers. Oh well, at least they're trying. And anyway, after Abu Ghraib and the discovery of the secret torture prisons run by our favorite Iraqis, I don't think they are really serious, or care, about their reputations.
And this was always, the report insists, part of their master plan all along. Even that 'Mission Accomplished" banner and George posing in San Diego harbor, were part of their brilliant plan for victory in Iraq.
"You see I was pretendin," George seems to be saying, winking and grinnin, and squinting at the teleprompter. "I was pretendin we had already won, to fool the terrorists in to thinkin they had already lost, to lull them into a false sense of security, so we could sneak up on em and hit them with this big plan here, and these pillars.."
"And lord knows in a pillar fight -at least the kind like me and Condi have down in Crawford after the misses is asleep, the guy with the biggest pillar wins every time.
Friday, November 18, 2005
Murtha's Momentum
I couldn't be more happy with Pennsylvania Congressman Murtha's recent comments, suggesting that the Iraq war is a 'failure wrapped in illusions', and recommending that we immediately begin to pull our troops out.
Lost in the cacophony of the Bush administration's panicked reaction though, were Murtha's suggestions that what really needs to happen now, is for the Iraqi's to take responsibility for their own revolution.
Think about our own revolution, and imagine if American patriots had been unwilling to act on their own, but had been 'rescued' by a pre-emptive attack by the French.
Imagine that the French had taken every major city in colonial America, had captured every British-appointed governor, and had an equivalent amount of troops stationed for five years after the fall of, perhaps, Boston.
Do you think Americans would have seized the opportunity and established the democracy we now know?
The Iraqis will not take seriously what they need to do, until and unless they are facing that situation.
It is of course questionable, whether the Iraqis have a strong enough desire for democracy to seize the opportunity that we have given them. But that is all the more reason why we need to pull out as soon as possible.
Would it better to stay five years more, lose another 2000 American soldiers, and then watch the Iraqis give back their country to the Bathists?
Is there anyone who really questions that in ten years, we will be looking at three, perhaps even four countries, where there was once the single Iraq?
Is there anyone unaware of the fact that the Iraq we know today, was the colonial creation of the British?
The Iraq War will go down in history as one of the greatest blunders of American foreign policy ever. The only thing worse would be to increase our losses by stubbornly refusing to acknowledge these facts.
Lost in the cacophony of the Bush administration's panicked reaction though, were Murtha's suggestions that what really needs to happen now, is for the Iraqi's to take responsibility for their own revolution.
Think about our own revolution, and imagine if American patriots had been unwilling to act on their own, but had been 'rescued' by a pre-emptive attack by the French.
Imagine that the French had taken every major city in colonial America, had captured every British-appointed governor, and had an equivalent amount of troops stationed for five years after the fall of, perhaps, Boston.
Do you think Americans would have seized the opportunity and established the democracy we now know?
The Iraqis will not take seriously what they need to do, until and unless they are facing that situation.
It is of course questionable, whether the Iraqis have a strong enough desire for democracy to seize the opportunity that we have given them. But that is all the more reason why we need to pull out as soon as possible.
Would it better to stay five years more, lose another 2000 American soldiers, and then watch the Iraqis give back their country to the Bathists?
Is there anyone who really questions that in ten years, we will be looking at three, perhaps even four countries, where there was once the single Iraq?
Is there anyone unaware of the fact that the Iraq we know today, was the colonial creation of the British?
The Iraq War will go down in history as one of the greatest blunders of American foreign policy ever. The only thing worse would be to increase our losses by stubbornly refusing to acknowledge these facts.
Thursday, November 10, 2005
PDTC Meeting November 30
The Plymouth Democratic Town Committee will meet on Wednesday, November 30th, in the upstairs conference room of the Main Library on South Street, beginning at 7:30. Among the items on the agenda will be the selection of a permanent meeting site.
If you have a suggestion for a meeting site, email PDTC chairman Jon Graham at jongrahamesq@aol.com
The PDTC now meets every fourth Wednesday of the month,at 7:30
If you have a suggestion for a meeting site, email PDTC chairman Jon Graham at jongrahamesq@aol.com
The PDTC now meets every fourth Wednesday of the month,at 7:30
Friday, September 09, 2005
Meeting Sites, Location Update
according to PDTC Communications Officer Alfieri...
The grassroots strategy meeting will be held at the law office of Lee Alfieri at 7 South Park Avenue at 7:30 PM on Thursday, Sept. 15th.
Movie night will be on Wed. Sept. 14th at the Plymouth Public Library at 7 PM. This month's movie is "Hijacking Catastrophe." It has been described as a Fahrenheit 911 for grown-ups.
The grassroots strategy meeting will be held at the law office of Lee Alfieri at 7 South Park Avenue at 7:30 PM on Thursday, Sept. 15th.
Movie night will be on Wed. Sept. 14th at the Plymouth Public Library at 7 PM. This month's movie is "Hijacking Catastrophe." It has been described as a Fahrenheit 911 for grown-ups.
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
Plymouth Peace Vigil
Members of an assortment of grassroots organizations along with unaffiliated local residents are taking part in a recurring Peace Vigil, every Wednesday evening in downtown Plymouth. The vigil begins at 6:30 p.m., at the UCC church on Leyden, and participants then walk slowly and silently down Court Street and back. It's an open invitation, and there is no need to RSVP: just show up and quietly voice your preference for peace.
Sunday, September 04, 2005
Meeting Dates, Location Changes
The PDTC has lost its long-standing meeting location at Cordage Commerce Park: congratulations to the owners for their success in revitalizing this important Plymouth Landmark!
As we look for a new permanent location for our monthly meetings, note also that we have changed the regular monthly meeting date: it is now every fourth THURSDAY, which means this month's meeting is the 22nd (stay tuned for where we will be meeting)
There will also be a Grassroots Organization Meeting on the 15th of September, but again the location is still 'up in the air'.
Please try to utilize this blog for current events and activities: you can either enter a comment to a blog posting anonymously, or provide us with your email and we will send you an invitation that formally allows you to post to the site.
As we look for a new permanent location for our monthly meetings, note also that we have changed the regular monthly meeting date: it is now every fourth THURSDAY, which means this month's meeting is the 22nd (stay tuned for where we will be meeting)
There will also be a Grassroots Organization Meeting on the 15th of September, but again the location is still 'up in the air'.
Please try to utilize this blog for current events and activities: you can either enter a comment to a blog posting anonymously, or provide us with your email and we will send you an invitation that formally allows you to post to the site.
Saturday, July 02, 2005
Advice and Consent
It is instructive to consider that Sandra Day O'Connor is considered by many in the religious right a traitor to the conservative cause. Allegedly, she had the 'right' perspective when she was first appointed to the court 25 years ago, but has since moved toward the middle.
My sense is that the middle has moved (or been dragged, kicking and screaming), not Ms. Day-O'Connor.
If the Conservative movement in American politics is most accurately represented by those with a far right ideology, is it accurate to call it 'conservative'? I think they should own up to their ideology - and adopt a term that the public understands: fundamentalist.
My sense is that the middle has moved (or been dragged, kicking and screaming), not Ms. Day-O'Connor.
If the Conservative movement in American politics is most accurately represented by those with a far right ideology, is it accurate to call it 'conservative'? I think they should own up to their ideology - and adopt a term that the public understands: fundamentalist.
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Sore Throat
The scrupulously objective national press are going to great lengths to present both sides of the story of, what I will call, the 'Felt Tipper' (otherwise known as Deep Throat).
You are forgiven if you have difficulty in perceiving another side to this story: afterall, time has given us more than ample evidence of the psychological flaws, and criminal intent, of former President Richard M. Nixon.
But in this era journalistic objectivity often has little to do with the facts, and everything to do with presenting two political perspectives.
So most of the news programs covered the revelation that former FBI assistant director Mark Felt was the famous anonymous source Deep Throat by asking for a discussion of whether Felt was a hero, or something else.
On one side are -for the most part, those who saw Watergate unfold from outside the White House, and who believe that without sources like Felt and others, no real investigation would have taken place. The President was at the heart of the conspiracy to cover-up and obstruct investigations, and at his command were the Attorney General, the White House Chief of Staff, the head of the FBI and many other people in power who were willing and able to lie to the American people. Felt had no choice but to go outside the normal chain of command.
One the other other side are the White House insiders - many of whom are now convicted felons, who are calling Felt everything from a traitor to a snake, and suggesting that he should have either resigned, 'gone through channels', or just kept his mouth shut.
Former Congressman Robert Dorn (one of the few condemning Felt who was not a former Nixon staffer) went so far as to blame Felt for the loss of the Vietnam War.
There is no arguing that the fall of Nixon was a momentous event in the history of the United States. There are those who would argue, however, that America would have been better off had the conspiracy never been revealed. Somehow loyalty, even loyalty to corrupt individuals or destructive ideology, is the virtue of virtues.
I simply believe that nothing founded on lies will stand the test of time.
You are forgiven if you have difficulty in perceiving another side to this story: afterall, time has given us more than ample evidence of the psychological flaws, and criminal intent, of former President Richard M. Nixon.
But in this era journalistic objectivity often has little to do with the facts, and everything to do with presenting two political perspectives.
So most of the news programs covered the revelation that former FBI assistant director Mark Felt was the famous anonymous source Deep Throat by asking for a discussion of whether Felt was a hero, or something else.
On one side are -for the most part, those who saw Watergate unfold from outside the White House, and who believe that without sources like Felt and others, no real investigation would have taken place. The President was at the heart of the conspiracy to cover-up and obstruct investigations, and at his command were the Attorney General, the White House Chief of Staff, the head of the FBI and many other people in power who were willing and able to lie to the American people. Felt had no choice but to go outside the normal chain of command.
One the other other side are the White House insiders - many of whom are now convicted felons, who are calling Felt everything from a traitor to a snake, and suggesting that he should have either resigned, 'gone through channels', or just kept his mouth shut.
Former Congressman Robert Dorn (one of the few condemning Felt who was not a former Nixon staffer) went so far as to blame Felt for the loss of the Vietnam War.
There is no arguing that the fall of Nixon was a momentous event in the history of the United States. There are those who would argue, however, that America would have been better off had the conspiracy never been revealed. Somehow loyalty, even loyalty to corrupt individuals or destructive ideology, is the virtue of virtues.
I simply believe that nothing founded on lies will stand the test of time.
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
A little respect?
The Great Compromise of '05 has been reached, but there are many questions, and many concerns remaining, at least on my part.
What exactly is the wording of the compromise, and what does it guarantee? It seems that the only guarantees are those that have been given to the Republicans: namely that they will have 'up or down' votes on five of their more controversial nominees, including Owens, Brown, and Pryor.
As I understand this compromise, the Democrats were not promised that the 'Nuclear Option' was off the table. The Republicans were not promised that the minority party would not invoke the filibuster at a future date, though I have heard it said that the filibuster will now only be used in extreme cases.
But if Owens, Brown, and Pryor are not extreme cases, I am at a loss to understand just who might be.
Underlying everything was a continued lack of respect -on the part of the Democratic leadership, for the important role that progressive activists have played in this and other debates. Democratic leaders have yet to understand that we do not represent a far-left, radical perspective. We represent a wide spectrum of political beliefs, but we are united against the far right, the religious right, and the corporate right.
I truly believe that without our efforts this so-called compromise would have never taken place. But to be honest, I feel that this compromise represents a defeat for progressives.
The real question is, who is responsible for this defeat: the right-wing, or the so-called moderates?
What exactly is the wording of the compromise, and what does it guarantee? It seems that the only guarantees are those that have been given to the Republicans: namely that they will have 'up or down' votes on five of their more controversial nominees, including Owens, Brown, and Pryor.
As I understand this compromise, the Democrats were not promised that the 'Nuclear Option' was off the table. The Republicans were not promised that the minority party would not invoke the filibuster at a future date, though I have heard it said that the filibuster will now only be used in extreme cases.
But if Owens, Brown, and Pryor are not extreme cases, I am at a loss to understand just who might be.
Underlying everything was a continued lack of respect -on the part of the Democratic leadership, for the important role that progressive activists have played in this and other debates. Democratic leaders have yet to understand that we do not represent a far-left, radical perspective. We represent a wide spectrum of political beliefs, but we are united against the far right, the religious right, and the corporate right.
I truly believe that without our efforts this so-called compromise would have never taken place. But to be honest, I feel that this compromise represents a defeat for progressives.
The real question is, who is responsible for this defeat: the right-wing, or the so-called moderates?
Saturday, May 14, 2005
Note from the Democratic State Convention
-I have just returned from the Democratic State Convention in Lowell, and so offer the following observations.
First, it seemed Deval Patrick's day. Patrick is a candidate for Governor - a relative newcomer to politics, but someone who it seems has hit the ground running. He was one of three declared candidates who was given five minutes to address the delegates, and he made the most of his opportunity, delivering an exciting, well paced stump speech using the catch-phrase 'Yes We Can!'.
Patrick was sandwiched between the other two gubernatorial candidate: Secretary of State Bill Galvin spoke first, and finally, Attorney General Tom Reilly delivered his address. Neither aroused much of an audience response and Reilly - who though he only officially declared on Friday (May 13) was very disappointing.
Reilly clearly has money, and organization, and strong backing from the party regulars but... Patrick seems to excite the average delegate (at least those at this convention) and, perhaps, offers an alternative to democrats and progressives who don't seemed to have been willing to back the nominee over the last 15 years.
The convention was also notable for a few other passionate speeches, most notably that of Senator Ted Kennedy - who ended his rousing speech with an impromptu dance to the classic rock song, 'Still the One', and a long speech by new Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean.
First, it seemed Deval Patrick's day. Patrick is a candidate for Governor - a relative newcomer to politics, but someone who it seems has hit the ground running. He was one of three declared candidates who was given five minutes to address the delegates, and he made the most of his opportunity, delivering an exciting, well paced stump speech using the catch-phrase 'Yes We Can!'.
Patrick was sandwiched between the other two gubernatorial candidate: Secretary of State Bill Galvin spoke first, and finally, Attorney General Tom Reilly delivered his address. Neither aroused much of an audience response and Reilly - who though he only officially declared on Friday (May 13) was very disappointing.
Reilly clearly has money, and organization, and strong backing from the party regulars but... Patrick seems to excite the average delegate (at least those at this convention) and, perhaps, offers an alternative to democrats and progressives who don't seemed to have been willing to back the nominee over the last 15 years.
The convention was also notable for a few other passionate speeches, most notably that of Senator Ted Kennedy - who ended his rousing speech with an impromptu dance to the classic rock song, 'Still the One', and a long speech by new Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
The 2005 Mass Democratic Platform
PREAMBLE
WE the Democrats of Massachusetts, in order to best assure our state success in this new century, hereby pledge to work for and support an agenda that creates opportunity, recognizes responsibility, and builds community.
WE embrace the Democratic traditions of our forebears, reaffirming our commitments to the tenets of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
WE recognize that a life which “insures domestic Tranquility” must provide good jobs, a good education, and quality health care.
WE recognize that to “secure the blessings of Liberty” we must honor families, invest in our communities, and safeguard the political rights of all our citizens.
WE recognize that to “promote the general Welfare” we must honor families, invest in our communities, and safeguard the political rights of all our citizens.
We believe in democratic government and in the power of good governance. As we begin this new century, we acknowledge the wisdom of our Founders, who crafted a Democracy that endures. Looking ahead, we dedicate ourselves to the proposition that the ideals of our past must become a workable force for the future. Cognizant of the challenges of our diversity, we guarantee a place at the table for every citizen and reaffirm our dedication to an all-inclusive Democratic Party. From Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal, through John F. Kennedy’s New Frontier, and Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society, the Democratic Party has always stood strong in support of pro-active solutions. We respect the individual positions members of our Party may take, and welcome all people to participate at every level of our Party. Steadfast in our resolve, we pledge ourselves to making this great experiment called democracy viable for generations to come.
To that end, on behalf of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, we hereby adopt the following platform:
Click Here to Read the Entire Platform
WE the Democrats of Massachusetts, in order to best assure our state success in this new century, hereby pledge to work for and support an agenda that creates opportunity, recognizes responsibility, and builds community.
WE embrace the Democratic traditions of our forebears, reaffirming our commitments to the tenets of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
WE recognize that a life which “insures domestic Tranquility” must provide good jobs, a good education, and quality health care.
WE recognize that to “secure the blessings of Liberty” we must honor families, invest in our communities, and safeguard the political rights of all our citizens.
WE recognize that to “promote the general Welfare” we must honor families, invest in our communities, and safeguard the political rights of all our citizens.
We believe in democratic government and in the power of good governance. As we begin this new century, we acknowledge the wisdom of our Founders, who crafted a Democracy that endures. Looking ahead, we dedicate ourselves to the proposition that the ideals of our past must become a workable force for the future. Cognizant of the challenges of our diversity, we guarantee a place at the table for every citizen and reaffirm our dedication to an all-inclusive Democratic Party. From Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal, through John F. Kennedy’s New Frontier, and Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society, the Democratic Party has always stood strong in support of pro-active solutions. We respect the individual positions members of our Party may take, and welcome all people to participate at every level of our Party. Steadfast in our resolve, we pledge ourselves to making this great experiment called democracy viable for generations to come.
To that end, on behalf of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, we hereby adopt the following platform:
Click Here to Read the Entire Platform
Thursday, April 21, 2005
24_Hour Filibuster Protesting 'Nuclear Option'
Have you got sixty seconds to spare?
Of course you do.
So do me a favor: seriously consider how you will react when the Republican-dominated Congress uses the 'Nuclear Option' to approve judges to the highest courts in this country, judges who have been nominated simply because they will advance a right-wing, conservative Christian agenda.
Think about it.
Then go to the People's Filibuster and register to be a reader (or just lend support) during our 24 hour filibuster on at the Joseph Moakley Court House in Boston.
If everyone spoke for just sixty seconds I would need 8640 voices to cover that 24 our period. If you just want to express your frustration or -in addition to signing up for the event, place your sixty second speech on the 24-hour filibuster blog at: http://www.24HourFilibuster.blogspot.com
Then ask a friend to do the same.
-Frank Mand, Plymouth, Massachusetts
Of course you do.
So do me a favor: seriously consider how you will react when the Republican-dominated Congress uses the 'Nuclear Option' to approve judges to the highest courts in this country, judges who have been nominated simply because they will advance a right-wing, conservative Christian agenda.
Think about it.
Then go to the People's Filibuster and register to be a reader (or just lend support) during our 24 hour filibuster on at the Joseph Moakley Court House in Boston.
If everyone spoke for just sixty seconds I would need 8640 voices to cover that 24 our period. If you just want to express your frustration or -in addition to signing up for the event, place your sixty second speech on the 24-hour filibuster blog at: http://www.24HourFilibuster.blogspot.com
Then ask a friend to do the same.
-Frank Mand, Plymouth, Massachusetts
Thursday, April 14, 2005
Delahunt Hosting Forum in Barnstable on Social Security
Rep. Bill Delahunt will host public forums this month for South Shore and Cape & Island residents, focusing on the future of Social Security.
The forums, which will feature Social Security Administration officials and other national experts, are scheduled for Monday, April 25 in Barnstable and Quincy:
Time: 9:30 - 11 am
Place: Cape Cod Community College
2244 Iyanough Road
West Barnstable
According to a release from Delahunt: "the April 25 forums are intended to clarify the nature and scope of the system’s problems and to outline various proposals to address them. Presentations will attempt to place the current debate in a historical context and to “connect the dots” to other developments – including the just-announced spike in Medicare premiums, which impact beneficiaries just as directly as any changes in Social Security policy."
Delahunt says he wants to hear "first-hand" the view of area residents – both current and future beneficiaries, and that, to date, the discussion has been "cheapened by demagoguery on all sides” .
I personally think it would be important for progressives from every local group to attend this meeting and to insist that any changes to the Social Security system meet three basic principles:
1. No reduction in benefits
2. National 401K Plan in addition to Social Security
3. New Revenue from combination of repeal of tax cuts for wealthiest 2% (including re-instatement of modified Estate Tax) and raising the point at which SS taxes end.
We are well into this 'fight', and although I know it is important for elected officials to listen to their constituents, members of Congress are elected as 'leaders'. I hope to hear Congressman Delahunt tell us what he thinks we should do to reform Social Security.
Email address for Delahunt: william.delahunt@mail.house.gov
The forums, which will feature Social Security Administration officials and other national experts, are scheduled for Monday, April 25 in Barnstable and Quincy:
Time: 9:30 - 11 am
Place: Cape Cod Community College
2244 Iyanough Road
West Barnstable
According to a release from Delahunt: "the April 25 forums are intended to clarify the nature and scope of the system’s problems and to outline various proposals to address them. Presentations will attempt to place the current debate in a historical context and to “connect the dots” to other developments – including the just-announced spike in Medicare premiums, which impact beneficiaries just as directly as any changes in Social Security policy."
Delahunt says he wants to hear "first-hand" the view of area residents – both current and future beneficiaries, and that, to date, the discussion has been "cheapened by demagoguery on all sides” .
I personally think it would be important for progressives from every local group to attend this meeting and to insist that any changes to the Social Security system meet three basic principles:
1. No reduction in benefits
2. National 401K Plan in addition to Social Security
3. New Revenue from combination of repeal of tax cuts for wealthiest 2% (including re-instatement of modified Estate Tax) and raising the point at which SS taxes end.
We are well into this 'fight', and although I know it is important for elected officials to listen to their constituents, members of Congress are elected as 'leaders'. I hope to hear Congressman Delahunt tell us what he thinks we should do to reform Social Security.
Email address for Delahunt: william.delahunt@mail.house.gov
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
Tell Delahunt to Vote Against the Repeal of the Estate Tax
The Bush administration's tax cuts over the last four years have led to big cuts in vital health and other services to working families, while exploding the national debt. Those tax cuts for millionaires, and the resulting budget deficits, are also a wasteful use of resources that could be used to shore up Social Security and Medicare.
This week, in what can only be described as a dramatic display of contempt for American families, Congress will try to permanently repeal the estate tax (helping the super-rich) and pass bankruptcy reform (hurting the middle class) at the same time.
This first vote will likely come today! Please call your representative right now and let them know you oppose both the repeal of the estate tax and the bankruptcy law changes.
Call:
Congressman William Delahunt
Local phone: 617-770-3700
DC Phone: 202-225-3111
(Toll Free: 800-794-9911)
Tell the staffer who answers that you are a constituent and that you would like Rep. Delahunt to vote against the repeal of the estate tax and against the bankruptcy bill because both reforms side with the super-rich and corporations over middle class families. Ask the staffer to send you a letter explaining the representative's position.
Email address for Delahunt: william.delahunt@mail.house.gov
This week, in what can only be described as a dramatic display of contempt for American families, Congress will try to permanently repeal the estate tax (helping the super-rich) and pass bankruptcy reform (hurting the middle class) at the same time.
This first vote will likely come today! Please call your representative right now and let them know you oppose both the repeal of the estate tax and the bankruptcy law changes.
Call:
Congressman William Delahunt
Local phone: 617-770-3700
DC Phone: 202-225-3111
(Toll Free: 800-794-9911)
Tell the staffer who answers that you are a constituent and that you would like Rep. Delahunt to vote against the repeal of the estate tax and against the bankruptcy bill because both reforms side with the super-rich and corporations over middle class families. Ask the staffer to send you a letter explaining the representative's position.
Email address for Delahunt: william.delahunt@mail.house.gov
Friday, April 08, 2005
Plymouth Democratic Town Committee
Plymouth Democratic Town Committee
This blog site is presently open for commenting by any and all visitors. In the future however, it will likely be modified to allow commentary by PDTC members -and Democratic officials, only.
Apart from restricting your postings and comments to issues relevant to the work of the committee, feel free to say what you want.
This blog site is presently open for commenting by any and all visitors. In the future however, it will likely be modified to allow commentary by PDTC members -and Democratic officials, only.
Apart from restricting your postings and comments to issues relevant to the work of the committee, feel free to say what you want.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)